Writ Petition 491 Cr.PC

Writ Petition 491 Cr.PC
Writ Petition 491 Cr.PC 


In the name of ALLAH, the most beneficent, the most merciful

 

Format of Writ Petition for recovery of detenu daughter (491 Cr.PC)

                                                                 

IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, RAWALPINDI BENCH, RAWALPINDI

 

W.P No. _______/2013

 

Farhan Yaseen  S/O Mehmood Alam  R/O Pupil, P.O Khas, Tehsil & District Khushab

                                                                             …Petitioner

 

                                      Versus

 

1.    SHO PS. Talagang, District Chakwal

2.    Malik Kamran Ali Gujar

3.    Riyan Alam Rajput 

4.    Suleman Alam Gujar

5.    Malik Riyan Mehmood  Butt

All sons of Shahzad Alam  R/O Bhalomar, Tehsil   

Talagang, District Chakwal

.Respondents

 

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 199 OF CONSTITUTION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF P AKSITAN, 1973 READ WITH SECTION 491 CR.PC FOR RECOVERY OF DETENUEE RIZWANA YASEEN   DAUGHTER OF PETITIONER CONFINED AT BHALOMAR, TEHSIL TALAGANG, DISTRICT CHAKWAL, ILLEGALLY BY RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO 5

 

Petitioner Respectfully submits as under:

 

A.               That through instant writ petition, petitioner wants to recover his real daughter  Rizwana Yaseen  who has been illegally detained in the House of respondent No. 2 to 5 and it is apprehended that she might be murdered in the hands of respondent No. 2 to 5.  Petitioner tried to file habeas petition before the Additional Session Judge, Talagang but he failed to do so as Respondent No. 2 to 5 are very influential persons and have deep connections with the political ruling party. The petitioner was not allowed to enter within the premises of Tehsil Talagang, District Chakwal and due to said life threats to the petitioner, instant writ petition is being filed.

 

1.                That addresses of the parties are correct for service of all kind of notices issued by this honourable court.

2.                That on 17-06-2011, Mst. Rizwana Yaseen  married with Respondent No. 2  and Rukhsati was also taken place on the same day. Copy of Nikah Nama is enclosed as Annexure “A”.

3.                That since Rukhsati, petitioner and his wife are not allowed to meet with their real daughter Mst. Rizwana Yaseen despite number of visits.

4.                That two days back, petitioner went to the house of the respondent No. 2 to meet his daughter. When he reached and entered into the house of the respondent No. 2, he saw that her daughter was badly beaten by the respondent No. 2 to 5 and her hands were tied with the rope. Upon said act, petitioner strongly objected and tried to release his daughter from the hands of respondents No. 2 to 5 but all in vain. Besides, petitioner was also beaten by respondent No. 2 to 5. Respondents No. 2 to 5 extended threats to the petitioner that if next time he came within the premises of Talagang, he would have to face dire consequences. In the meantime, daughter of the petitioner informed the petitioner that she had been confined in a room from the day first by the respondent No. 2 to 5 and she would be murdered by the respondents No. 2 to 5. She further asked the petitioner that respondent No. 2 compelled the daughter of petitioner for illicit relations with other persons for gain of money.

5.                That petitioner approached the respondent No. 1 and requested for legal action against the respondents No. 2 to 5 but no action has been as taken so far.

6.                That thereafter, petitioner contacted with Mr. Imtiaz Malik Advocate at Talagang to file habeas petition before the learned Additional Session Judge, Talagang. In the meantime, respondents No. 2 to 5 along with four unknown person came at Kechechry Talagang and extended threats to the petitioner that if any petition was filed against them, he would be murdered and no body was dare to save him. Besides, petitioner was forcibly compelled to leave the Kechechry. Petitioner had to leave the Kechechry.  

7.                That petitioner seeks recovery of his real daughter Rizwana Yaseen  from the custody of Respondents No. 2 to 5 on the following grounds.

 

 

GROUNDS:

 

(i)                            That it is apprehended that daughter of the petitioner shall be murdered by the Respondents No. 2 to 5 or otherwise, she may be compelled for prostitution. With said intention, custody of respondent No. 2 cannot be declared as lawful custody regarding husband and wife.

(ii)                          That daughter of the petitioner has been confined in a locked room and no one is allowed to meet her. Petitioner being real father has vested right to meet with her daughter but she is not allowed to meet to anyone.

(iii)                        That petitioner is eye-witness of torture and confinement of her daughter in a locked room. All the respondents No. 2 is husband of daughter of the petitioner but no law of land permits him to confine his wife in a locked room and to compel his wife for developing illicit relations with the persons for gain of money.

(iv)                        That fundamental rights guaranteed by the constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan have been violated  by the Respondent No. 2 to 5.

 

8.                That petitioner has no  other efficious, speedy and alternative remedy except to invoke constitutional jurisdiction of this Honourable Court.

  

Under the circumstances as stated above It is respectfully, prayed that respondent No. 1 may kindly be directed to produce the detenu Mst. Rizwana Yaseen confined at Bhalomar, Tehsil   Talagang, District Chakwal before this Honourable Court who may kindly be handed over to the petitioner and set at liberty from the illegal confinement of the respondents No. 2 to 5 in the interest of justice.

 

                                                                             Petitioner

 

                  

Through

 

 

                                                          Arslan Ali Bhatti

                                                          Advocate, High Court.

 

CERTIFICATE:

 

Certified as per instructions

(i)                   This is the first application in this Honorable court.

(ii)                 Nothing is pending regard subject matter before the August Supreme Court of Pakistan.

(iii)               Respondent No. 1 is impleaded in his official capacity.

                                                                            

Advocate


Download 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post